The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

3-28-1997

Abstract

I start with Aristotle’s theory of definition in order to claim that Aristotle could not reasonably have included the catharsis clause in the definition of tragedy on his own strictures. Moreover, in case we could solve this problem, I expose some very serious shortcomings that result in the Poetics itself, which are never or rarely acknowledged, if the catharsis clause is kept. Finally, given statements of Strabo and Plutarch, I suggest that the clause was probably a mistaken interpolation by an editor who repaired a damaged Aristotelian manuscript or who imagined that he was augmenting deficient Aristotelian doctrine. M.D. Petrusevski ingeniously thought that the original manuscript contained the words pramatön sustasin, “actions brought together,” that the words were corrupted, and unfortunately restored as we have them, pathématân katharsin.15 However, I shall argue ultimately that the whole catharsis clause, whether or not intended as a repair, is an illegitimate addition and should be marked accordingly.

Notes

Gregory Scott presented “Athetizing the Catharsis Clause in the Poetics” to the Society at its meeting with the Pacific Division of the American Philosophical Association in Berkeley 1997. A much revised version was published as “Purging the Poetics” in Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 25 (2003) 233-263. This version is reprinted as Ch 5 in his Aristotle on Dramatic Musical Composition: The Real Role of Literature, Catharsis, Music and Dance in the Poetics, 2016, available from Amazon in paperback or on Kindle.

For information about the author see: http://www.philoconsult.com/about.html

Share

COinS