aid, distributive justice, need, poverty
This paper examines how people think about aiding others in a way that can inform both theory and practice. It uses data gathered from Kiva, an online, non-profit organization that allows individuals to aid other individuals around the world, to isolate intuitions that people find broadly compelling. The central result of the paper is that people seem to give more priority to aiding those in greater need at least below some threshold. That is, the data strongly suggest incorporating both a threshold and a prioritarian principle into the analysis of what principles for aid distribution people accept. This conclusion should be of broad interest to aid practitioners and policy makers. It may also provide important information for political philosophers interested in building, justifying, and criticizing theories about meeting needs using empirical evidence.
Accepted for publication for the journal: Philosophical Psychology
Hassoun, Nicole; Malikov, Emir; and Lubchenco, Nathan, "How People Think about Distributing Aid" (2016). Philosophy Faculty Scholarship. 18.