Author ORCID Identifier

Laura Lipke https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3653-5843

Jenn Monnin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4842-2814

Catherine Fonseca https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7671-7652

Document Type

Other

Publication Date

Fall 11-20-2025

Keywords

Systematic review, rebuttal, Google scholar, search strategy, library, non-medical reviews, methodology, reproducibility, validity, reliability

Abstract

Letter to the Editor and Rebuttal to Winn et al. (2024)

We are writing to express concerns regarding the article, Redefining searching in non-medical sciences systematic reviews: The ascendance of Google Scholar as the primary database (Winn et al., 2024a). Our concerns are numerous, and include issues involving the research questions, data availability and validity, representations of evidence synthesis methods, and the disregard for established scholarship which refutes the reliability, transparency and reproducibility of Google Scholar searches for evidence synthesis reviews.

Publisher Attribution

Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 1– 4 © The Author(s) 2025 Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions DOI: 10.1177/09610006251387675 journals.sagepub.com/home/lis

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.