•  
  •  
 

Author ORCID Identifier

0009-0005-0370-2942

DOI

10.22191/BUUJ/10/2/7

Faculty Sponsor

Professor Daniel Burkett

Abstract

Fred Feldman’s Justicized Act Utilitarianism (JAU) seeks to address the distributive shortcomings of consequentialist theories by incorporating justice in his axiology. By considering the distribution of intrinsic goods rather than solely their quantity, JAU aims to preserve consequentialism’s core principles while addressing justice-based objections. This paper critically examines JAU, arguing that while Feldman’s theory marks a significant advancement, it ultimately fails to reconcile consequentialism with justice in a meaningful way. Following an exposition of JAU, two critiques are presented through thought experiments to test its boundaries and implications.

Included in

Philosophy Commons

Share

COinS